r/unitedkingdom May 27 '23

Boots boss more than doubles pay to £3.8m as chain triples profits

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/may/26/boots-boss-pay-profits-stores
791 Upvotes

259

u/adept-grumblefish28 May 27 '23

Drive an organisation to massive success, get financially rewarded. Seems fair enough to me.

391

u/Overthrow_Capitalism May 27 '23

I agree, but not when said "success" is at the expense of employees and customers the former of whom haven't received a pay rise / lost jobs due to store closures, and the latter experience higher prices as a result of profiteering.

78

u/Smellytangerina May 27 '23

The shop closures are due to them not making any money. How many businesses do you think would survive if they kept failing branches open?

87

u/MerePotato May 27 '23

Okay, but couldn't some of those millions have gone to pay rises for existing employees given the countries current financial situation

29

u/Squiffyp1 May 27 '23

58k employees.

His payrise of £1.9m would mean an extra £33 each.

And potentially this guy quitting for an organisation that rewards success and Boots going back into decline, risking everyone's job.

75

u/QuitYour May 27 '23

His payrise of £1.9m would mean an extra £33 each.

But the chain has tripled profits which is probably the point, I wouldn't say you have to dedicate the entire £157m pre-tax profit but some of it would be nice.

72

u/Smellytangerina May 27 '23

And, you’re right, they should. They agreed to a decent rise for pharmacists (4.5%) and trainee pharmacists (11, I think) but their sales staff are not seeing much at all.

And, if aldi and Lidl have shown us anything, rewarding staff properly makes you money. It’s a shame more companies don’t seem to grasp that.

23

u/QuitYour May 27 '23

I mean 4.5% might've been decent 2 years ago, but inflation is at 8.7% so it probably still falls short. I would guess by that distribution they make more money from their pharmacy than they do other parts of the shop, but I am possibly firmly talking out of my ass with that guess.

4

u/oshatokujah May 27 '23

Sales staff just got a 9% pay rise last month

7

u/Equivalent_Age8406 May 28 '23

That was the bare minimum pay rise they had to give to stay in line with minimum wage..

6

u/oshatokujah May 28 '23

Previous lowest band at boots was £10 an hour. Minimum wage is now £10.42. That would be a 4.2% increase to be in line with minimum wage. They now pay £10.90 to the lowest band.

It’s still not a wonderful wage but there are plenty of companies with bigger profit margins paying their workers the bare minimum year in and year out.

You can also opt in to train on pharmacy or beauty counters to push your wage up further, I work as a dispenser so they’ve pushed my hourly rate up to £11.67. For contrast, companies like Asda don’t pay pharmacy colleague any more despite requiring GPHC accredited training to carry out the role.

TLDR: I’m not arguing Boots is great, but there’s definitely worse out there, which is why I ended up back at Boots personally.

0

u/BurlyJoesBudgetEnema May 28 '23

And the overlords provideth

2

u/Lartec345 May 28 '23

Richard Branson grasped this, until he didn't....

-1

u/f3ydr4uth4 May 28 '23

Branson is a chancer he literally committed tax fraud very early on in his career.

1

u/Lartec345 May 28 '23

I'm talking about how he used to tout that one should look after ones staff but during covid he fired his virgin air staff iirc

1

u/BurlyJoesBudgetEnema May 28 '23

4.5% is not a decent pay rise, that’s a 5.5% pay cut

2

u/salty_nigerian Jun 29 '23

A month late but I'm 18, I work at boots, I love my job as a sales assistant/healthcare advisor but the only pay rise I've seen in the 2 years I've worked there is an additional 50p per hour. Granted, I earn way more than minimum wage and more than the majority of my friends, but regardless. I've seen none of the help in pay rises to combat inflation, but maybe that's because I'm only 18. Who knows. I shouldn't say too much anyway lol

9

u/MerePotato May 27 '23

Yeah I made a pretty silly argument back there, was focusing on looking after the dog and half paying attention to Reddit on my phone.

That being said however, if the company truly tripled its profits could it not afford to pass some of that onto the regular employees that also worked hard towards its success? If you ask me the only fair way to do this is he and his employees get a pay rise, or no-one gets a pay rise. It doesn't need to be double or triple pay like him, even just an extra 1k per person would go a long way.

5

u/3between20characters May 27 '23

I'll take £33

2

u/CheekyFunLovinBastid May 27 '23

Where can I get this £33 I keep hearing about?

1

u/Speakin_Swaghili May 29 '23

It’s amazing how much some people hate the idea of giving g working class people a raise.

0

u/snipars69 May 29 '23

Capitalism is evil

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '23

Thought school hadn't broken up for summer yet

→ More replies

8

u/Dad-Has-A-Small-Cock May 27 '23

"not making any money"

'Boss doubles pay'

4

u/things_U_choose_2_b May 28 '23

If they're not making any money, how are they making triple profits?

3

u/Smellytangerina May 28 '23

Individual stores were not making money, which is why they are closing them and why the overall company profits are up.

0

u/Random_Brit_ May 27 '23

When you have a business on that scale things become more complex.

E.g. it could be worthwhile to run a loss making branch if they felt that would help generally improve the brand to get better success in other branches.

Or while that is hypothetical, I remember reading about some big firms that would have one shop with everything at ridiclous prices that no-one would ever buy, just to be able to use that as a comparison when the company offers a discount. (exaggerated example : item normally costs £10 everywhere but "special" branch tries to sell it for £100. So now normal branch can offer the item at £9 but claim its over a 90% discount when it's really just a 10% discount).

That's one solid reason why a large business could run a loss making branch, I bet there are many more.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Come on yes very occasionally you would keep a loss making stow open for brand but the second part of your comment is totally irrelevant. Either way none of it applies here.

-1

u/Random_Brit_ May 27 '23

The very easily solidly provable point I said carries less weight then what I said was a hypothetical point (as proof is less available on my first point, but readily available for my second)?

Sorry mate, it's Saturday night and I have people I can have rational discussions with, but you don't seem to be one.

4

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

It’s not a rational discussion. They have closed 40 stores, leaving thousands behind. Why on earth does the idea that some of these could have needed to be loss leader stores come from? Are there no London stores left? Have they closed the Heathrow stores? No and no. It’s just pointless baseless speculations.

As for “high price anchor stores” the laws changed about where sale prices can be derived from so having it for sale in a single store doesn’t count any more but even if that wasn’t the case (and it is) they have thousands of other stores left.

So back to my point: none of this applies in this situation, and in fact isn’t even factually correct in the case of the latter.

0

u/Random_Brit_ May 27 '23

I think everything I said still stands except one issue:

From your response, I might be misunderstood about the current status of "high price anchor stores" that might not be allowed anymore.

Your last reply gives me something to look into to disprove what I said so I can only honestly say thanks.

3

u/AncientNortherner May 27 '23

the latter experience higher prices as a result of profiteering

Totally untrue. Profit margins have fallen so they cannot have been profiteering.

1

u/wayne2000 May 27 '23

Profiteering, is that the new buzz word round here.

-1

u/Overthrow_Capitalism May 27 '23

It's particularly pertinent in the current economic climate.

2

u/wayne2000 May 27 '23

Boots UK limited turned over £6.5bn and made a profit of £15m (after making a £111m loss in the previous year). that's 0.2% not 2%, 0.2% profit margin. How is that profiteering?

2

u/wayne2000 May 28 '23

Still waiting on how boots are profiteering? Any suggestions?

-1

u/Overthrow_Capitalism May 28 '23

I didn't see your comment. You've been waiting? Sad.

Pre-tax profit £137m, £44.5m last yr. Sales up by 10% to £7.8bn. Boot prices have gone up a lot this year, CEO pay doubles, employee salaries haven't.

1

u/wayne2000 May 28 '23

Because I know you are full of it.

Profit up because of sale of stores, not items they regularly sell.

Don't even make .1% net profit. Lost £111m in the prior year.

How is the profit of £15m on £6.5bn turnover unfair? What other stores work on those margins?

Share price is down over 5 years, you sure they are profiteering?

0

u/Overthrow_Capitalism May 28 '23

Shareholders are still getting stable dividends, and who knows what sort of tax arrangements WBA has. Yes, they're profiteering, of course they are. Basic arithmetic doesn't really apply.

1

u/wayne2000 May 28 '23

Profiteering that much that shareholders on average have sold rather than bought the shares in the company, nice try.

What % net profit wouldn't be profiteering out of curiosity?

0

u/Spam250 May 27 '23

Seems so.

Driving profit and growth is also literally the guys job. I don't get how people see it as a bad word either really.

His job is literally to extract profit from customers

1

u/wayne2000 May 27 '23

Especially when they made losses of more than 100m prior year and then only profited at 0.2% margin last year. I swear no one uses common sense around here.

1

u/twoforty_ May 27 '23

Are they making the business profitable?

1

u/Forsaken-Director683 May 28 '23

Regarding higher prices, the beauty of consumerism means the customers have a choice.

→ More replies

51

u/jj198hands May 27 '23

Drive an organisation to massive success

Any evidence that he’s done that? According to the article he’s just closed shops and the open ones benefited from the end of covid.

20

u/cass1o May 27 '23

Apparently underpaying staff and closing unprofitable locations is a super complex job that only someone rewarded with stupid amounts of money could do.

Let's be honest, an excel spreadsheet could have done what he did (and honestly it probably was what did it behind the scenes).

7

u/TheBeaverKing May 28 '23

Having worked directly for a number of CEOs running £100m companies and spent a bit of time with one running a £1b company, you do not have a clue what you're talking about.

Years ago I had ambitions to make it to that kind of level but having seen what is involved and the type of person it takes, I neither want, nor believe I am capable, of doing that kind of job.

-1

u/cass1o May 28 '23

I am sure quaffing all that champagne and caviar takes a toll on the body but I think I could do it for a decade.

5

u/TheBeaverKing May 28 '23

If you think that is the job then you really have no clue. The CEO of the business I work for regularly works 18 hour days, is always aware of what is going on in the business, is constantly funding employee social activities and has lead the business to 6 fold growth over the last 5 years.

He gets paid very well for it but that doesn't change the fact I respect his ability to do his job very well.

1

u/mooninuranus May 28 '23

I think you’re confusing facts with ‘let’s grab the pitchforks’ rhetoric.

It really is amazing how many people on Reddit could run an organisation with over 50,000 employees. What I can’t work out is why they’re not doing it already.

-1

u/entropy_bucket May 28 '23

That's the tyranny of working closer to power. Courtiers always used think the king has something special until it turned out they didn't.

4

u/TheBeaverKing May 28 '23

King's were born into power, whether they were suitable or not. Modern business CEOs have either been selected based on ability or built something successful enough that they've earnt the position.

The fact is that anyone that thinks running a business is simple or that they're generally overpaid in relation to the bulk of their employees (some exceptions do apply) does not understand the requirements, responsibilities, stress or capabilities needed for the role.

-2

u/cass1o May 28 '23

Modern business CEOs have either been selected based on ability or built something successful enough that they've earnt the position.

Hahaha, Hahahaha, hahaha. Oh wait, you actually believe this.

→ More replies

6

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Lol you have less than zero idea what it takes to do this job.

→ More replies

29

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Where are the employee rewards? They actually do the work. Has their pay gone up at the same scale? Unlikely

0

u/Clarkster7425 May 27 '23

they do the work yes, but a cashier is replaceable, someone else will always be available to do the work cheaper

11

u/AsaCoco_Alumni May 27 '23

A CEO is also replaceable.
And there'll also be a line of ppl willing to do the job for less.

7

u/HatchedLake721 May 27 '23

How many people in your circle have the skills to be a cashier?

How many people in your circle have the skills to run a £6 billion business and be responsible for 50,000 people receiving their wages every month?

10

u/Psyc3 May 27 '23

They aren't responsible for this. That would be the finance department.

While strategic leadership has a lot of value, it isn't one person.

0

u/HatchedLake721 May 27 '23

And who said it’s one person?

CEO builds the people and people build the business.

The point is company’s success heavily relies on the direction the CEO sets it on, that either destroys the company (Debenhams, HMV) leaving the finance department you mention without enough cash to pay salaries/vendors/etc, or propels the company to the top.

It’s big money, big responsibility, big renumeration.

4

u/Psyc3 May 27 '23

You did. Claiming one person runs a £6 billion business.

It is well known that CEO pay, and cashier pay, has been decoupled with output over the decades.

4

u/HatchedLake721 May 27 '23

I didn't claim one person runs a £6 billion business.

I claimed that even though CEOs are replaceable, they're not as easily replaceable as a cashier, because pool of available people who have the skills to run a £6 billion business is minuscule.

That's why shareholders of multibillion companies pay the person who's responsible for the success or failure of the company x100+ times more than a cashier.

2

u/Haan_Solo May 28 '23

The ratio between CEO and average worker pay was much much lower 50+ years ago and businesses were still successful, the responsibilities of a CEO were the same back then as they are now.

→ More replies

3

u/VreamCanMan May 28 '23

This ignores the fact that incompetence can and does happen in upper management roles, and whilst some forms of incompetence can be extremely disruptive for the business, potentially causing a crash, many others won't hurt the organisation noticeably, but will stifle it's growth.

Given this^ there'd be just as many people I know who could with some retraining take the position and perform relatively poorly but not bankrupt the company.

I feel like CEOs jobs are often grossly understated in terms of their required workload,

I also feel like we get ourselves a bit lost in the just world hypothesis bias when we assume all CEOs are insanely competent and have to be to maintain their position.

-1

u/bdbdhsjdju83737 May 27 '23

Not as replaceable as a CEO tho

4

u/Popular_Earth_1456 May 27 '23

Actually both pharmacist and pharmacy technician are shortage occupations so...

21

u/pressmonday May 27 '23

Yeah cause the CEO alone is responsible for the success of a business, not the pharmacists and other employees. Where is their share?

13

u/Suitable-Length4255 May 27 '23

Do you have any idea of Reddit demographics?

18

u/glisteningoxygen May 27 '23

Teenagers, the unemployed, the unemployable, part time dog walkers ect ect ect

2

u/adept-grumblefish28 May 27 '23

You'd think I would by now. Basically a bunch of lazy malcontents who want the world handed to them for nothing, trying to drag down anybody who was willing to put in the work required to succeed.

11

u/cat-snooze May 27 '23

Read a book, stop mindlessly parroting boomer propaganda

7

u/Tef-al May 27 '23

And then there's r/wallstreetbets

3

u/Dude4001 UK May 27 '23

Why do you view it as dragging the people at the top down if the people at the bottom were also fairly remunerated for their work? Do poor people have to suffer in order for the rich to be judged to be succeeding?

→ More replies

7

u/luvinlifetoo May 27 '23

Pay the all the fucking workers properly then

8

u/SecretSeera May 27 '23

Wouldn't it be lovely to see the world in such simple terms without ever looking under the surface. Why is it that the only group that seems to be getting richer are CEOs and everyone else gets poorer and more overworked?

3

u/hamsterwaffle May 27 '23

As long as all the other workers who enabled the success also get rewarded.

5

u/ZestyData May 27 '23

It seems like the workers drove the successes. Where are there commensurate financial rewards?

4

u/AdrianFish May 27 '23

Yeah I guess he did the proper hard work, didn’t he? Not the sales assistant stood up behind a till serving customers for 8 hours a day.

1

u/salty_nigerian Jun 29 '23

If you knew of half of the abuse and shit we have to put up with from entitled assholes. You would not be saying that.

-1

u/AccordingGain3179 May 27 '23

This reply is so ignorant it’s actually funny.

Yes, a cashier’s job is real tough buddy. The CEOs don’t work hard.

2

u/AdrianFish May 27 '23

Guessing you’ve never worked as a cashier ‘buddy’. Fucking try it and then call me ignorant again

1

u/Kitchner Wales -> London May 28 '23

Guessing you’ve never worked as a cashier ‘buddy’.

And you've never worked as a CEO and have no idea what it entails. Why are you getting offended when he's saying your job is easy when they've never done it, but you feel totally OK saying the same thing about a job you've never done?

3

u/AdrianFish May 29 '23 edited May 29 '23

My job? You don’t know a thing about me or what I do for a living. That said, I work harder than a CEO - that I know for a fact - but I certainly won’t be seeing a pay rise in the millions for overworking and underpaying staff.

0

u/[deleted] May 29 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] May 29 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Nicola_Botgeon Scotland | South Queensferry Police Station Jun 01 '23

Removed/warning. This contained a personal attack, disrupting the conversation. This discourages participation. Please help improve the subreddit by discussing points, not the person. Action will be taken on repeat offenders.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies

3

u/JessyPengkman May 27 '23

Wish I could be this optimistic about yet another corporation underpaying and overworking staff

3

u/ElementalEffects May 28 '23

The CEO didn't create those profits, the workers did. CEO pay used to be 50x worker pay, now on average it's 300x at big companies

2

u/Aliktren Dorset May 27 '23

At the cost of upending the slim reputation they had

2

u/imdonewiththisshit99 May 27 '23

By cutting staff and runnthebplace in to the ground and making fortune of mandatory tests for covid isn't really driving to success.

2

u/snipars69 May 29 '23

Yeah we all know CEO is doing all the work the employees just chill at home.

1

u/cat-snooze May 27 '23

Seems fair to me too, but it seems that hasn't happened to literally all but a handful of people who drove that success.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Were the wages of the staff suitably doubled?

4

u/Lorry_Al May 27 '23

And next year when profits fall you're ok with staff wages falling too?

1

u/[deleted] May 30 '23

That happens right now. It's called lay offs and closures.

1

u/robertodurian May 27 '23

I mean, that’s his job isn’t it? He gets paid to drive the success of the company.

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Lmao

1

u/Thortung May 28 '23

Except the peons that made it happen get fuck all.

0

u/PuzzleheadedGuide184 May 27 '23

Yup. Powers the economy. Keeps people in jobs. Either that or boots goes to S*** and this sub is bemoaning the failure of the high street, redundancies etc.

1

u/MassiveBoa May 28 '23

Least deluded libertarian

1

u/onionliker1 May 28 '23

I think a pushchair is harder to drive, so where's my multiple lifetimes of money?

1

u/mojo1287 May 30 '23

Greedflation, understaffing and real terms paycuts = massive success. OK then.

-1

u/Kingsworth Lincolnshire May 28 '23

No no no what a silly suggestion, CEOs should get the same pay as the cleaners and shelf stackers!

-5

u/Darox94 May 27 '23

This is Britain, specifically r/unitedkingdom. We don't celebrate success here.

198

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

110

u/The_Sleer_ May 27 '23

As someone who has worked at boots recently, yes they very much overwork and understaff

16

u/Flowerhands Nottinghamshire May 27 '23

Ex-boots head office worker and the company is stingy as hell, pays under market rate for pretty much every role and loves to exploit interns/apprentices. So many better private sector companies to work for, unless you're senior management+, naturally.

18

u/nick2k23 May 27 '23

Gregg's does this

13

u/Alarmed_Inflation196 May 28 '23

Greggs always seem to have enough staff, they're just inefficient. Often they will just stand at the coffee machine waiting for it to finish, when there's a queue of 10 people, instead of e.g. taking your payment.

-2

u/The5th-Butcher May 27 '23

Nope they don't

1

u/nick2k23 May 27 '23

They so do

0

u/The5th-Butcher May 28 '23

Not the one I work in

4

u/nick2k23 May 28 '23

Well you are lucky my friend

13

u/HumpbackWhalesRLit Essex May 27 '23

My local boots had to close for most of the week recently because they’re so understaffed.

13

u/Lilshrek009 May 27 '23

Sainsburys are doing the Same shit, at least in the one I work in.

6

u/Powderandpencils May 28 '23

Yeah I had the same when I used to work for Sainsbury's. It got worse over covid.

8

u/Bloody-smashing Scotland May 27 '23

Yup. Got rid of counter assistants in pharmacies. Now the pharmacist and dispensers cover the tills, the pharmacy counter plus do all the stuff needed in the dispensary.

7

u/nascentt UK May 27 '23

Yes. In fact I'd go as far to say there is no staff. The branches I've been to in London are all self checkouts. Good luck finding staff if you have questions.

5

u/uses_facts_badly May 28 '23

Bit late to the conversation but yes absolutely. Boots sold off many of their manufacturing sites some years ago to fareva namely boots contract manufacturing, whilst maintaining the supply chain to the incumbent. At the same time they laid off alot of r&d, instead transferring many of the requirements to their suppliers both domestically and abroad. They are known in the industry for being slow to pay, have low contract performance. Speaking with their staff I know they realize this but the staff are under trained, under resourced to actually be effective. They have high turnover of staff which is symptomatic. Their offering revolves around traditional pharma which has certain barriers to entry hence profitable, and retail within which they seek binding agreements to lock in smaller up and coming brands for exclusivity which every brand I've had contact with struggle to make work for many of the reasons stated above, in fmcg it is very difficult to achieve sustainable scale when locked into exclusivity.

The whole industry is grappling with the times changing and these stories of profits growing do not equate to value being added. It's not wheat being separated from chaff... It's chaff being separated from rot. See Wilko for comparison.

-1

u/wayne2000 May 27 '23

Boots UK limited turned over £6.5bn and made a profit of £15m (after making a £111m loss in the previous year). that's 0.2% not 2%, 0.2% profit margin.

Are you really complaining?

131

u/McCloudUK May 27 '23

I'm at work today (not at boots) but it's public facing and I've had 3 complaints about Boots today already. Opening late, staff overworked and one pharmacist available at a HUGE store.

Sounds like another profits over people corporation.

26

u/MoodyBernoulli May 27 '23

Every time I go into our local boots I take a look at the queue and decide it’s not worth queuing for 15 minutes for whatever it is that I need.

10

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

The investors in these businesses only care about the short term. The long-term reputation of the company is of zero interest to them.

7

u/davesy69 May 27 '23

The American way.

8

u/trekken1977 May 27 '23

Not at all. Have you met Americans? No patience at all, incredibly competitive, and a strong customer service focus.

Another business would recognise the gap in fast service and open up shop right across the way.

4

u/A-Grey-World May 28 '23

Another business would recognise the gap in fast service and open up shop right across the way.

Are there any retail stores in the US that aren't megacorps? I get the impression it's all Wallmarts.

1

u/trekken1977 May 30 '23

I guess it depends on what you mean by megacorps. Probably a similar mix as here though. Boots, Superdrug, Lloyds vs CVS, Walgreens, Rite Aid, etc

5

u/oshatokujah May 27 '23

Devil’s advocate, pharmacists are expensive. Just because the store is massive doesn’t mean the pharmacy business is.

I work in a store where we dispense 1100 items a week, the store is massive and set over two floors and the retail side takes £250k+ a week. The pharmacy side does about £4k of that.

I’ve worked in a store that was attached to a GP surgery that was about the size of my living room that did 5500 items a week and the retail side maybe took £500 a week.

There’s no real correlation to it and if I’m honest, it’s an awful business to staff for because half of the tasks we have to do are things we shouldn’t really be dealing with.

2

u/wayne2000 May 27 '23

They made a loss of 111m in 2021, what do you want them to do?

2

u/KeptLow UK May 29 '23

They got bought out by Walgreens right? No surprise that they're getting turned into profit machine rather than a positive place to work

63

u/TeflonBoy May 27 '23

I’ve been shopping at boots recently because you just can’t trust Amazon stuff. I’ve had so many fake products it’s just not worth it, especially if your putting it on/in your body.

Switched to boots and Argos for delivery stuff.

37

u/debating109 May 27 '23

Agreed, I literally only use amazon for videogames now. Quality control is poor and rampant counterfeiting on electrical goods. It’s not safe to trust them with health and cosmetic items.

6

u/GaryHarrisEsquire May 27 '23

Yep. Got fake Levi jeans from them and now rarely use for anything. Fuck Amazon

19

u/zioNacious May 27 '23

Same plus wilko for those cheap household things that are actually more expensive on Amazon (and more likely to break)

12

u/CapableLetterhead May 27 '23

It's definitely not cheap anymore. I really limit what I buy from amazon now.

8

u/retr0grade77 May 27 '23

It’s not even cheaper on Amazon 9/10. No idea why people use it so liberally.

And, like you say, the quality is horrendous.

46

u/Sacu_Shi_again May 27 '23

Hope the staff on the shopfloor, offices, warehouses..the ones who physically do the work, meet the KPIs and move the goods...get the same percentage rise as the CEO.

If not, fuck Boots.

13

u/smegmarash May 27 '23

Think I can answer that for you

27

u/Chingchongbingbong0 May 27 '23 edited May 27 '23

So I worked for boots providing assisted covid swabs at a drive thru site (we physically swab your nose and throat) for the first 8 months or so of the pandemic in England.

A few things to point out.

1 - Boots advertised for unpaid volunteers when they had already been awarded the contract for providing assisted swabs on site. Iirc the money paid out at the start of the contracts was in the millions. Like are you fucking shitting me? You've got a massive sum of cash and you want unpaid volunteers... Christ on a bike.

2 - I had my hours and pay per hour cut within 2 months of being there and was given a Walgreens staff discount card as alternative. Like buddy I've only ever brought my prescriptions from boots and that's not included. I get it Walgreens owns more than boots but I'd rather have the cash.

3 - They were having to employ Sodexo agency staff at nearly double our rate because they couldn't retain the boots staff. Being asked to do double shifts with someone who is earning double the amount you're. This creates a lot of animosity between team members and management.

4 - The sites themselves were administered and managed by SERCO. SERCO=management, Blue Arrow= Traffic and self testing, Boots=assisted swabbing, various security companies for gate securities.

5 - With all the health + safety + cross contamination doo dar obviously there were several stations around the site with all staff having to change masks and clean hands before proceeding to the next area etc. Well the 'manager' employed by serco insisted she was unable to wear a mask and was able to move from a red zone (swabbing area) to amber and to green without alcohol rubbing the hands. Her excuse was she was asthmatic but smoked 40 straights a day?

6 - We had a 'secret shopper' come through our bay when the head of The Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) was due to make a visit to our site. The 'service user' immediately asked why the above mentioned person was in the red area with no mask or visor. My reply was we work for boots and have no say in it. She's a manager. Lol she got a bollocking and 2 weeks later went back to the usual routine.

I get I went off topic a bit towards the end but I think you'll appreciate it. I could sit here and type 10 more points to do with Sodexo Serco and Boots but I cba.

Late stage capitalism at its finest.

Edit:

Bonus point:My last shift there all boots staff were handed a 'what can we do to improve / retain staff form'

Verbatim my answer:

"Pay your staff properly and stop shitting on them"

Proudly signed my name on that bitch.

25

u/Ylancoi May 27 '23

It's true about low employee pay, but high CEO pay is aspirational. Employees can look across the carpark at the CEO's shiny Veyron and know that if they work hard, put in the hours, and do their best they will see the results and before long he'll have an even newer, better one.

11

u/comune May 27 '23

Company does well. Ceo gets new car. Company does bad, you lose your job.

9

u/hesalivejim May 27 '23

*Company does bad, the government bails it out

23

u/Yeriant May 27 '23

My Local Boots has become a terrible place to shop. Empty shelves, No Staff and long queues. Young pharmacy staff rushed off their feet. Go to Superdrug or Poundland Now.

13

u/gintokireddit England May 27 '23

Boots pays pretty low from what I've seen. Dunno about now, but around 2017-2018, IT helpdesk staff were on like 15.3k a year (for reference, over-25 minimum wage from April 2018 was 15.3k/year at 37.5hrs/week). 2nd line I think was only 2-3k more, so those people were still coming to work on buses. And that's on a rota that starts as early as 6:30am.

I'm sure the warehouses etc don't pay amazingly, but then that's most warehouse work in general, especially in the modern era, since things like 1.5-3x pay for antisocial hours or weekends have mostly gone away.

5

u/No-Poem May 28 '23

Girlfriend works as an assistant store manager and is on only 25p/hr above minimum wage. Really takes the piss. I have tried to encourage her to change jobs but I think she really enjoys the job.

11

u/user900800700 May 27 '23

And yet they still removed the fucking salmon pasta from the meal deal. Cunts

11

u/djpolofish May 27 '23

Starvation wages, above inflation price rises and cuts to the workforce... well done here's £3.8 million

8

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

[deleted]

0

u/entropy_bucket May 28 '23

Also, how sustainable is the success? Just having a good year should not be enough. For all we know, he's replaced all the pills with the sugar cubes and is making bank. They should pay out over a decade of success.

5

u/srrymydog8yrtwinkie May 27 '23

The state of my local Boots stores reflect this headline. They are sterile, plastic, borderline dirty and unwelcoming. You can tell that every breath of freshness has been squeezed out of them to make corporate wealthier. It's so bizarre and depressing.

3

u/hairybastid May 27 '23

I've stopped going to Boots for my prescriptions. They've halved the staff and doubled the clientele. Massive queue, disgruntled customers, and staff worn out from being overworked. I use Pharmacy2U, get everything delivered to my door every month. Fuck Boots and their profiteering.

4

u/Bloody-smashing Scotland May 27 '23

We got a 4.5% as pharmacist last year (depending) basically if you were at the bottom of the pay scale as a pharmacist you got 4.5% others got less.

Given the inflation rate and the shit pharmacists dealt with during covid the pay rise they offered us absolutely wasn’t good enough.

Now with this in the news I wonder what our pay rise will be this year.

Don’t even get my started on the dispensers and other staff in boots. I ask them every day why they still do the job when they get even shitter pay rises and could get more working in Aldi.

3

u/TheBrassDancer Canterbury May 27 '23

I imagine they must make a lot of their money from prescription charges. Because who is going in there to buy a sandwich, for example, or any of their vastly overpriced products which can be found cheaper elsewhere?

4

u/radiant_0wl May 27 '23

Boots meal deal is highly rated. Not as good as five years ago but for those with an advantage card it's an affordable quality option.

Although for anything else I hardly use Boots.

2

u/luvinlifetoo May 27 '23

… and vehemently denies profiteering- iT’s woRkErS drIViNg infLAtiOn

3

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

All businesses - especially game developers, Netflix and Nvidia - should be run for the explicit reason of providing ill-informed Redditors with everything they want, for as little as possible. Any deviation from the hive minds opinion on the correct price will be considered 'price-gouging'

2

u/ChromedSoul May 27 '23

How is this even possible? Every Boots I've been in is in an awful state, limited staff and not a great choice of products, and waiting up to an hour for prescriptions. How is this even possible in this day and age when I see so many homeless people on the streets of London. This is criminal!

1

u/somethingdecent69 May 27 '23

I would have no problem with this as long as the lowest paid worker is on a true living wage (£30k+ per year?) & the rest of the country wasn't in a cost of living crisis!

1

u/Vdubnub88 May 27 '23

Like every other business. Blaming inflation to hike prices for increased profits.

1

u/HUAONE May 27 '23

I had a very nice experience at the boots optometrists a few months ago. That is all.

0

u/ffsnametaken May 27 '23

Probably saved a lot of money by cancelling the reward points people saved up when they couldn't go into the store over the pandemic

1

u/[deleted] May 27 '23

Never any staff, long waits for service. Who still shops here?

1

u/JohnR2299 May 27 '23

Ben and Jerry's that shit, no one should earn more than 5x the lowest paid employee in the company

1

u/jseng27 May 27 '23

New boat for the bigwigs, price increase for the rest

1

u/Kittykatkvnt May 27 '23

You know what? The way I read that title I thought that the boss had more than doubled the pay of staff hahahaha

How fucking stupid do I feel right now?!

1

u/AlGunner May 27 '23

But shops arent using the cost of living crisis to rip people off.

1

u/TheStargunner May 27 '23

I’m all for overthrowing capitalism but being rewarded double pay when profits triple under your leadership isn’t the strongest narrative in the world.

At the end of the day human labour isn’t going to be an equal effort and equal outcome and equal motivation game. Even if we give everyone equal opportunities and a place in society you will have places for some form of leadership and I’d hope they were going to drive a good outcome.

1

u/BugsyMalone_ May 28 '23

Im baffled why people shop in Boots. Last few times of been there a lot of the prices are laughably overpriced. Maybe older people? No idea.

-1

u/PersistentWorld May 27 '23

Who the fuck is shopping at Boots? It's an absolute dinosaur of a shop.